In all, somehow they’re sending us clues.
As is every poetic author/narrator who can adeptly weave a vivid image to put
the actual into the conceptual. Transferring our world into our minds. Oh, I suppose
anyone could do the quick switch with little effort, but it merely falls right
back out, making it an agonizingly ongoing sashay of the urges. If it doesn’t
stick, it didn’t really happen.
Twitter and Facebook personalities
with hundreds of thousands of followers and into the millions. This is a thing.
Who can comprehend such devotion? Would the historical prophets have had that
many disciples? The Pope has 2.6 million followers on Twitter (though he
follows only 8 back). Kim Kardashian and Justin Bieber have considerably more
millions in their flock than the Pontiff. A final tally shows the Dalai Lama
as highest among the sages (unless you count Paris Hilton), as he’s no more
than 89th in the world with 7.2 million followers.
Once someone has accumulated such a mass of humanity, how could there be room for any more? Their cup is full, yet we keep pouring.
Once someone has accumulated such a mass of humanity, how could there be room for any more? Their cup is full, yet we keep pouring.
The celebrity status now having more
of a forum than ever to pass along its menagerie of wisdom, wit and propaganda
to an approving constituency. This conduit has us firmly plugged in to
their every whims, as if waiting for our next set of instructions. Some may
seem quite innocuous, though isn’t that just the persona they’d want to
project?
Aristotles Horowitz, Carlin, Loesch, Dawkins, Stewart. |
When seeking online recommendations
for accounts or blogs to follow, I’m presented with the most popular. Much too
simplistic an approach. It makes the rich richer and keeps the poor poor, plus
popularity doesn’t necessarily equate with merit anyway. What if I want to
catch people when they’re just starting out, before everyone is aware of their
name? I could hop on the next meteor before it left the station. What's big, though, isn’t really that big. Popular movies… meh. Popular tunes… meh. Popular TV shows… double meh.
Popular Twitter accounts… who can keep up? If there were a hundred Penn
Jillettes, none of them would be able to squeeze out the time to notice — let
alone recognize — me. I’m invisible to Penn Jillette. I could be one of his
magic tricks.
Thinking I was in a bad episode of Hype in Space, I honestly saw a caption for a video
on a media website which read: “Hurry and watch it before it goes viral.” Huh?
Why, so you can say you saw it before other people did? Is it a race? Are we
stuck in some third grade mentality that we need to do anything and everything
to advance to the front of the line? Must. Have. Information. And sooner than
later, as well as quickly. Andele, andele…
Alas, the family of man, almost to a
man, wants to get some credit for his circumstance, be it laudworthy or
lamentable. We want our accomplishments and our sufferings noted. The ego points us there, so it’s not all our fault. We likewise
want credit for those we know in our august circles, if only by association to
make our own stock rise. Perhaps why we adopt pet celebrity status achievers,
and hang onto them as if we’re superglued to our ideals via our imaginary rescuers.
That can’t end well.
The most likely cadre of wisdom finds one
Eckhart Tolle the author very near the nerve center. He eloquently speaks of a new earth,
that’s parts idealistic, visionary and immediate in its cleansing capabilities. He’s subtly
and unreligiously bringing a world back toward a Savior figure it’s attempting
to dance around, yet he’s the one who knows the steps. Tolle is a moral
compass, for if the world rejects him it rejects its own nature. But even
better, he knows it’s not about himself. He doesn’t confuse the messenger with
the message. (not pictured here, as you wish)
Aristotles Sawyer, Blazer, Prager, Jillette, Berlinski. |
In the end, have we listened to very
many great teachers in our time? Horowitz, to his credit, awakens Fyodor Dostoevsky
to this point in time to a rousing encore. A teacher invoking an erstwhile teacher, provided for
emphasis. Will it matter much? Horowitz remains skeptical, yet makes the effort
nonetheless. He does it because he feels it needed to be done, that it is part
of his genetic makeup.
Meanwhile in metropolis, half the
western world hangs on political pundit Glenn Beck’s every word, while the
other half scorns him. Is he wise or just popular from provocation? He very
well may be leading an underground swell, which skates past mere politics — one
in the tradition of Gandhi or Martin Luther. Indeed, Beck once had Muse’s
“Uprising” for his show’s intro, apropos as if they had been personally
commandeered to sing for his throngs of a movement afoot.
The inimitable Beck appears in some
circles to be a visionary in addition to a revolutionary. Oprah, in contrast,
having had a grand following for much longer, comprises a modus operandi
consisting less of grandiose causes or extended tomes. After all, she’s on a
first-name basis now. Beyonce. Madonna. Cher. Bono. (What, no Sonny?) Sting.
Prince. Seal. Liberace. Sade. Fabio. Okay, Fabio is an anomaly, an outlier… a
freak occurrence in cultural phenomena, if you will. He just won’t go away. He
keeps showing up everywhere, like he’s stalking all of us en masse. He holds
the record for a person I’ve seen in the most places without ever hearing them
talk, holding a comfortable margin over Teller and Marcel Marceau. Even in his dying days, he’ll
be showing up places in his walker, tripping over his hair. My theory is that there are in reality
about twenty Fabios, a Fabio collective, and they’re scattered all over the Earth, each
one showing up at random times to further the undying legacy of their venerated namesake.
At closer inspection, Beck doesn’t fit
the Loser label proscribed by his political opponents who have mostly animus
toward him. For one, he doesn’t toe any party line. He publishes biographies,
novels, historical commentary, which all go to the top of the seller lists by strange coincidence, with some evangelism thrown in, and everything
he touches turns to goldline.com. His political self is only a portion of his
makeup. Admirably, he gathers scads of high profile people and various throngs
of his ilk at large weekend-long events about morality, community, social unity
and allegiance to a higher power. Everything he does points to crusade. Where is he taking
his people? Ah, never mind…
At any rate, the staid “Glenn” is too
basic a name to make into the singular, so he’ll need to take on some other
stylish moniker if he is to continue his quest. Maybe after a worthy cause… Blazer,
perhaps?
Ultimately, why would we listen to all
these people? And why are George Carlin and Jon Stewart two of our time’s most
erudite philosophers? How do Cosby and Seinfeld know so much about us? Where is
our Sartre, our Hegel? If we saw one on television, would we notice? Was Paul Harvey a shooting star over the horizon, yet now forgotten? If I keep asking, will someone please raise their hand?
Monsieurs Fabio, Fabio, Fabio, Fabio. |
Ready to burst onto the scene like gangbusters, forthright Dana Loesch (pronounced “lash”, as in
panache) of St. Louis radio fame is a crusader’s crusader. While the regular
crusaders are crusading for the common people, she’s crusading for the people
as well as the other crusaders, all at the same time. She’s in the public conscious enough to have a
national audience, and yet two weeks ago she retweeted something I tweeted to
her as well as commented on it. It was the most significant 15 seconds of fame
in my social media life, and one of her finest moments as well. I think she could be President someday, though she’s
commented to people that she doesn’t like to play nice with others, so in her mind it
wouldn’t work. Possibly a few centuries before her time. Dana, meet Galileo.
Helbig, it should be pointed out, is
the first person who could easily be Madeline Kahn’s twin sister, not in an
identical sort of way, but behaviorally. Her candor and down-to-earth demeanor
allow her a vehicle to state basic sentiments others are unwilling to confront for
fear of alienating some of the paying customers, pulling it off as if she were
speaking to you as just one other person in her presence. That’s hard to do in
general terms, and nigh impossible if you’re not genuine. Dear Grace never met
pretension, for it doesn’t speak her name, oh no.
Instead of compounding meaning, she
deconstructs meaning. She’s less a comic, and more a figure being a regular
person in an amusing way while not trying to go out and impress anyone but
still ending up with better results than most comics and adding some genuine grade philosophy to her repertoire. The everyperson can identify
with her as she spews forth quasi-intellectualism. Think Russell Brand, but with an intensified charm factor way up to
11. Or Goldie Hawn with a noggin. Or Gilda Radner’s deadpan cleverly mixed with
a surprising dose of realism. As a
result, what emanates from Helbig is authentic. Now if we could just get her
and Stewart to tone down the bleeping expletives, I don’t know, hopefully
it wouldn’t take away some of their authenticity. Pray a cable network
grabs her before HBO does, so we don’t corrupt one of our last remaining icons of this generation.
Amazing Grace generally talks rather
deliberately, not in any hurry to get to the end of a sentence. She’ll even
pause for a better word before speaking one, and do so unapologetically without
expression. This is someone comfortable in their own skin, who obviously
ordered the right size.
Amazing Grace, Grace, Grace, Grace, Bear. |
And yet when she wants to, like when
issuing a faux disclaimer, Grace can rattle off three sentences faster than you
can think, and then you realize you might have received some kind of subliminal message in the process. How can one’s lips move so fast, you think to yourself. Probably
some special grade of lip gloss. Oh, and Helbig has 250,000 Twitter followers.
She could start a new major city with them, being their humble ruler, as all bring fist to the chin in her signature move. I’m
guessing there wouldn’t be a whole lot of overlap with the Pope’s Twitter followers
there. Maybe we could do a study on that. But where is she taking her people? We might need to go along in order to
find out.
Messages transmitting all around. And how much
are we listening? I spent over an hour this morning talking on the phone to customer service about ways to obtain my credit card’s security code without the aid of having the card on my person. This quickly spiraled into a modern mystery in three acts. After battling for seven rounds, time won. I should’ve thrown the match in the first round and still gotten out with my dignity and daily agenda intact. Ground control to Major Tom…
More apparent on the talking head radar, Blazer is
appealing to the latent spiritual yearnings of a culture being drowned out by
competing cacophonies. A mass of humanity inundated with itself, suffocating on
its own flesh. Blazer has a lot of work to do to arouse them from their slumber.
And Tolle will be in to clean up the mess when the dust finally settles. He’ll
take those who are still around to the next step, as Blazer is just a set-up
man. The Pope watches earnestly from the balcony.
Horowitz knows that his work is done
here. He hasn’t bothered anyone, and his life can be used as a template for
safekeeping. Penn has stuck a pin in the cognoscenti, and they’ve taken
notice. He’ll be performing in Vegas till the Great Awakening occurs. Dawkins
will keep us grounded to the immediate and act as an apt counterweight to the
tidings of hope. Meanwhile, Dennis Prager will ever so esoterically serve as this century’s
quintessential Aristotle for anyone who cares. It was incumbent on Harvey to pass the torch. Loesch,
she’ll have an opportunity to be President, among other things, but will reach
much higher. She’ll figure it out. It’s in her DNA. Dana’s Nascent Ascension.
Then lastly, for all her exploits, our blessed Helbig,
having taken the reductionist tack in capturing the essence of nihilistic
fervor, is a perpetual nomad of the spirits. What she wants to do with her shtick is up to
her. She can take it to the end of the line or get off at any stop of her
choosing. That’s how in control she is. Keep an eye on her for hints.
The trick for us is to balance these
multifarious messages at just the right calibration, and shun the pretenders,
the amateurs, the charlatans, the hucksters, the ones with anything to pitch. Plug
in to the media machines at your peril. Precisely what that balance is, is
unknown. That’s why it’s a trick. If everybody were David Copperfield, nobody
would be impressed by David Copperfield. That deserves a duh. So anyway, don’t put a plethora of flour or sugar
in your recipe (and, as always, just a dash of salt), because there is
discretion in all things. Even too much of an item as indispensable as air will
hyperventilate you. Ask Fabio, he’ll tell you.
No comments:
Post a Comment